hillary clinton


Liberals for some reason are discounting any and all theory — regardless of evidence — that includes the very idea that COVID-19 was developed in a lab in Wuhan. This is especially true if said theory says that the virus may have been intentionally released. But in 2009, Hillary Clinton was warning of exactly this scenario.

Clinton called President Trump a racist when he said the virus may have originated in a lab in Wuhan. But was the idea racist in 2009 when she said the Wuhan Institute of Virology could be a source of “biological weapons proliferation.” The source is a cable obtained by Wikileaks, which plainly states these concerns:

The U.S. believes participants would benefit from hearing about your experiences assisting China in setting up a Biosafety Level-4 (BSL-4) laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology from the export control and intangible technology transfer perspectives. We are particularly interested to know how China plans to vet incoming foreign researchers from countries of biological weapons proliferation concern.

Information Exchange participants could benefit from a presentation on how you vet visa applicants to prevent intangible technology transfer to countries of chemical and biological weapons proliferation concerns.

This concern has existed long before COVID-19 was a thing. Now, any time someone so much as mentions the very increasingly likely possibility that the Wuhan lab developed the Coronavirus, they are shouted down as a “racist” by everyone on the Left — all of whom seem to say that any speculation, even backed with evidence, is racist and contributes to “anti-Asian bigotry.” The problem with this is that no one hates Asians. We simply want the truth about what is going on.

Hillary Clinton is now singing a different tune, joining the “bigotry” crowd in saying that China couldn’t and wouldn’t unleash a biological weapon on the world. Except, they would.

Meet Joel Davis. Joel served as an official on Hillary Clinton’s campaign — and he also founded the anti-child-sex-abuse organization, Youth to End Sexual Violence. The first part makes him seem pretty slimy, but the second gives us hope that maybe there is a decent person buried underneath Joel’s leftist views. Unfortunately, what’s on the surface matches what’s inside, as he was just sentenced for child rape charges as well as child porn featuring very young children.

Davis, who was once nominated for a Nobel Prize, was arrested in 2018 after raping a child. Investigators found more than 3,700 child pornography photos and 330 videos of child pornography. Many of the children were not even 12 years old. A Justice Department memo lays out the sordid details:

Audrey Strauss, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that JOEL DAVIS was sentenced to 156 months in prison for enticing a child to engage in illegal sexual activity, 60 months for possession of child pornography, and 60 months for distribution and receipt of child pornography, all to be served concurrently.  DAVIS previously pled guilty on January 16, 2020, before United States District Judge George B. Daniels, who also imposed the sentence.

U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss said: “As he previously admitted, Joel Davis, founder of a non-profit called ‘Youth to End Sexual Violence,’ admitted to engaging in the very abhorrent behavior he had publicly pledged to fight.  Davis, who also claims to be a Nobel Prize nominee for his work with his organization, engaged in sex acts with a minor, recording them, and distributing that recording to others – including an undercover FBI agent. Sex with minors is obviously never permissible, acceptable, or justifiable, and by virtue of his non-profit work, Joel Davis was acutely aware of the irreparable harm these crimes inflict on victims. Davis will now serve a lengthy time in federal prison, where he can no longer victimize minors.”

According to the Information and other documents filed in the case to which DAVIS pled, as well as statements made during the plea proceeding:

In or about June 2018, DAVIS used a dating application on his iPhone to entice a fifteen-year-old boy (the “Victim”) to engage in sexual activity with him.  On June 13, 2018, DAVIS invited the Victim to his apartment building in Manhattan and engaged in sexual activity with the Victim, despite knowing that the Victim was a minor.  DAVIS used his smartphone to film a portion of that conduct and sent the video to at least two others, including an undercover FBI agent. 

In addition, between at least in or about May 2018 and June 2018, DAVIS possessed more than 3,700 images and more than 330 videos of child pornography, including numerous images of prepubescent minors who had not attained 12 years of age, and received and distributed material containing child pornography using a cellphone.  DAVIS was arrested on June 26, 2018.

Clinton herself has been accused of being involved in child sex trafficking. While evidence has not sufficiently linked her to it, many of her associates including Davis and Epstein and more have absolutely been busted in scenarios hat fit in with it. While it can’t be definitively said that Clinton is involved, a lot of her friends sure are.

Christopher Sign performed a great service to America when he broke the Clinton-Lynch Tarmac story that took the country be storm. The story broke in 2016 during the Trump/Clinton race and contributed heavily to President Trump’s victory. Now, Sign has been found dead.

The Wrap reports that Sign’s death, which is being investigated as a suicide, happened on Saturday after a long career was a reporter:

In 2016 while a reporter at Phoenix ABC affiliate KNXV-TV, Sign broke the story of the so-called ‘Tarmac’ meeting between Clinton and Lynch on Lynch’s private plane at the Phoenix airport in June, 2016. The meeting happened while Hillary Clinton was still being investigated by the FBI for how she handled certain emails during her time as Secretary of State under Barack Obama. Lynch was heavily criticized and acknowledged that meeting with Clinton was ill advised, but maintained it was “primarily social” and that she did not discuss that investigation.

Nevertheless, it created complications for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, even after the FBI determined that she did not break any laws. And it ultimately played a role in the circumstances leading to her narrow electoral college loss later that year despite winning the popular vote by millions.

Sign would later write a book about the meeting called “Secret on the Tarmac,” in which he claimed the meeting was planned in advance and was not, as Lynch and Clinton said, a chance encounter.

Sign began his career at ABC 33/40 in the late 1990s before moving to Phoenix in 2004. Sign returned to Birmingham to work for ABC 33/40 again in 2017; according to the ABC affiliate, Sign turned down a national network job offer in order to do so.

It’s unclear if it was a suicide or not, but it is well-known that Sign has been receiving death threats since the story first broke:

So what really happened? Did Sign kill himself? Or did someone kill him to shut him up or to get revenge for his revelations that sunk Hillary Clinton? It’s possible we will never know.

Hillary Clinton still isn’t taking losing to Donald Trump in 2016 very well. On the “Just Something About Her” podcast with host Jennifer Palmieri, a former Clinton spokeswoman, Clinton launched into an unhinged rant attacking gun owners, Republicans, Ted Cruz specifically, and more.

“You know, democracy is the balancing of interests and rights, and unfortunately at this time, the gun worshipers have a huge advantage because of the filibuster and because of their shameless exploitation of people’s unwarranted fears,” Clinton babbled. This is untrue. The Senate is split 50-50 and Kamala Harris is the tiebreaker. Democrats have the upper hand and fear the filibuster because it evens things out.

“The opportunists on the other side, like Cruz and his ilk,” she says, “know better and they are in the position of trying to keep people really riled up and scared that sensible gun legislation like we had in the ‘90s for 10 years will somehow undermine their rights.”

“Well, what about the rights of all the rest of us?” Clinton raged. “The rights of us to go to work, go shopping, go on dates to the movie theater, go to school, for heaven’s sake — what about the rest of us?”

The full interview has yet to be released, but The Recount tweeted some of Clinton’s remarks. We can be sure that the rest of it is spent launching evidenceless attacks against Republicans, whining about Donald Trump, and scaremongering the sheep on the Left into whatever Democrats’ next unconstitutional scheme is. Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer says that he intends to bring gun control legislation to the Senate when it is next in session. Watch the video below:

Hillary Clinton just can’t let go of the fact that Donald Trump took her to the cleaners in 2016. In an interview with the Washington Post, the weird lady who accidentally unified Trump supporters under he “Deplorables” banner with her ridiculous “basket” remark decided that once again she would open her mouth about American citizens who didn’t want her to be President and instead chose the other guy.

“Well, I don’t think about it that way,” Clinton said when asked if she felt “vindicated” for her “basket of deplorables” comment. “I am profoundly saddened by what he has catalyzed and the allies that he has in certain parts of the media, both traditional and online — the way he has, in effect, created a cult against the fundamental values and norms of the United States.”

“It is really troubling to see the Republican Party turn themselves into a cult and basically pledge allegiance, not to the United States of America, but to Donald Trump,” Clinton said in the interview, which was published on International Women’s Day. “Something I do not understand, I cannot accept…”

“Even I don’t pretend to have imagined that he would incite a riot and an attack on our Capitol in an effort to reverse an election he clearly lost,” Clinton says, falsely accusing the President of inciting a riot when he in fact tried to calm the crowd. “It’s of no comfort to me that I and others warned about him because the damage that he’s done is so profound.”

Clinton is once again embarrassing herself. Voters chose Trump over here. But to Ms. Clinton, anyone who isn’t far-Left is too “deplorable” to matter and those who don’t support her or Joe Biden are simply a “cult.” There’s no explaining how Democrats feel it is OK to slander those with whom they disagree, but that’s the only play in their book. Watch this monumental Clinton brand of stupidity below: