The Supreme Court has largely rejected election-related lawsuits latey. So many were surprised when the high court agreed to take on a case related to Arizona’s recently-passed laws banning ballot harvesting and tightening controls over provisional ballots. Not only did the Supreme Court take on the case, but it killed liberals’ election-stealing dreams in Arizona.

USA Today reports that the case, which it calls “the most significant to deal with voting rights to come before the court since 2013,” ended with a 6-3 majority vote in favor of the state’s right to deal with ballot harvesting and other unethical behaviors loved by leftists:

Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinion for a 6-3 majority, joined by the court’s conservatives. Associate Justice Elena Kagan wrote a dissent, joined by the court’s liberals, that described the majority opinion as “tragic.”  

The case, the most significant to deal with voting rights to come before the court since 2013, dealt with two provisions of Arizona’s voting law approved long before the 2020 election. State officials passed a law in 2016 barring unions and advocacy organizations from collecting voters’ mail-in ballots, a practice that critics call “ballot harvesting.” 

Democrat stooge Elena Kagan says that the 6-3 decision is a violation of the Voting Rights Act. “What is tragic here is that the Court has (yet again) rewritten – in order to weaken – a statute that stands as a monument to America’s greatness, and protects against its basest impulses,” she says. “What is tragic is that the court has damaged a statute designed to bring about ‘the end of discrimination in voting.'”   The Left argues that these rules impact communities of color disproportionately — but that argument fizzles out once it leaves the media and enters a courtroom, where evidence can be examined responsibly.

This ruling is bad for Democrats, but good for America.

Democrats are going nuts over the recount efforts in Arizona, which threaten to undermine their story that Joe Biden won the presidency legitimately. Now, patriots in Georgia are joining the fight. A judge in Georgia has ruled that nearly 150,000 absentee ballots must be unsealed as part of an audit effort to ensure the legitimacy of both the presidential election and the state Senate runoffs — all three of which saw Democrats “win.”

Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero has ordered more than 145,000 ballots must be unsealed for inspection. The Atlanta Constitution-Journal reports that while exact details of the audit are being worked out, the goal is to scan and examine the absentee ballots to determine their legitimacy:

At a hearing Friday, Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero made clear the ballots must remain in the custody of Fulton election officials. That could prevent the kind of allegations of mishandling ballots and improper procedures that have dogged a Republican-sponsored audit of ballots in Arizona in recent weeks.

The latest Georgia review cannot change the election results, which were certified months ago and have already been confirmed by multiple recounts. But the plaintiffs say an examination of ballots would get to the bottom of what they see as suspicious activity by election officials at State Farm Arena in November.

The lawsuit was filed by nine Georgia residents who, like a staggering percentage of Americans, believe there was a lot of shady business in the 2020 election. It’s one of more than 30 lawsuits that addressed alleged fraud associated with Joe Biden’s “victory.”

“Voter confidence in our election system is the bedrock of our republic,” says former GOP Senator Kelly Loeffler. “Unfortunately, inconsistencies in Fulton County’s November 2020 absentee ballots cast serious doubt on voters’ faith in our elections.”

Democrats, however, are upset. “It is outrageous that Fulton County continues to be a target of those who cannot accept the results from last year’s election,” says Democrat Fulton County Commission Chairman Robb Pitts. “The votes have been counted multiple times, including a hand recount, and no evidence of fraud has been found.

Though this is a victory, it should be noted that Amero opposed a private company auditing the ballots with high-resolution scanning and inspection. Amero plan to order the ballots to be scanned by county officials. The plaintiffs will then be allowed to examine the images. Voting rights group Fair Fight calls it, rightfully,  “a sideshow, not an audit.”

It’s unclear what will happen with this, but we must wonder what is so terrifying about a legitimate audit?

Democrats’ election bill is weird — unless your goal is to steal every election going forward. Democrats are designing a bill that gives them everything President Trump warned us about — bans on voter ID laws, bans on voter roll purges, which are used to remove ineligible voters from the rolls (including dead people), a requirement that mail-in ballots be accepted late, and more. The bill contains over 700 pages that virtually guarantee that any election in the future can be stolen.

The Gateway Pundit reports that a witness for Democrats in a Wednesday hearing related to the bill railed against the idea of removing the dead from the voter rolls. because this constitutes “voter suppression.” Under our country’s laws, the dead may not vote. This is a privilege afforded to legal citizens who are, of course, alive. States regularly purge voter rolls of the deceased, though Democrats have recently invented issues with that, pretending that the goal was to disenfranchise the living.

Dead voters who are concerned with losing their ability to vote in U.S. elections will soon, if Democrats have their way, not have any worries. They’ll be able to fill in votes for whatever leftist is running for office — all because Democrats say that people who are (infrequently) incorrectly removed from voter rolls are enough of a reason to fail to protect the integrity of our elections.

2020 was a mess. The Left used the pandemic to fundamentally reshape how elections happen — mail-in voting, late acceptance of votes in some cases, ballot harvesting. Joe Biden may have “won,” but it was under extremely suspicious circumstances. And Democrats say that this should be the norm rather than an absolute cluster-mess that we need to fix going forward.

This bill cannot become law. The future of our country depends on it. Watch it below: