Texas may become the next state to officially protect the vote from cheating. On Thursday, the state Senate passed a new bill that Senator Bryan Hughes (R) says will make it “easy to vote and hard to cheat” in the Lone Star State.

Joe Biden lost Texas by a narrow margin in the 2020 election as many pointed out suspicious activity in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Texas, and all around the country. Recently, Georgia took action and passed hundreds of pages of law intended to protect the vote. These include voter ID requirements for mail-in ballots to ensure the person sending one in is the actual voter, tighter controls on ballot harvesting and dropboxes, and more.

“This bill is about making it easy to vote and hard to cheat. We had a long debate. Scores of amendments were offered, and at the end of the day, the Texas Senate passed a strong election integrity bill that we can be proud of,” says the Texas state Senator. “It heads over to the House now for more work, and election integrity bills continue to move through the process.”

NBC News says the bill “banned overnight early voting hours and drive-thru early voting, while restricting how election officials handle mail voting.” The bill prohibits “proactively send[ing] applications to vote by mail to voters, even if they qualify” as well — a tactic used to confuse and manipulate voters.

“Overall, this bill is designed to address areas throughout the process where bad actors can take advantage, so Texans can feel confident that their elections are fair, honest and open,” Hughes says, assuring Americans that the bill will ensure “every Texan has a fair and equal opportunity to vote, regardless of where they live in the state.”

Democrats, naturally, hate the bill. “As I see this bill, it’s a pure case of suppression,” Texas State Senator Borris Miles says. “There are some things in here that are really offensive. This hurts to the core.” He didn’t elaborate.

It’s unclear what the bill will look like after changes are made, but one thing is for certain — Americans believe that the vote count and the election should be something we can trust.

Delta has learned a lesson about sticking its nose where it doesn’t belong. In an effort to gain political clout with the current presidential administration, the company’s CEO spoke out against recent laws passed in Georgia that are intended to protect the integrity of the vote. All of this happened despite the company requiring ID to board planes. Unfortunately in currying favor with leftists, the company made some enemies — like Georgians.

Nearly all Americans support voter ID laws — especially after the 2020 election, where many suspect cheating ran rampant and ultimately installed Joe Biden in the Oval Office — and even replaced some Senators in Georgia. The situation was so bad that the state passed new legislation requiring, among other things, valid ID when submitting mail-in ballots. Democrats call reasonable measures to make sure all votes are from eligible voters “racist” and “Jim Crow-style.” Apparently, the CEO of Delta agrees.

“Last week, the Georgia legislature passed a sweeping voting reform act that could make it harder for many Georgians, particularly those in our Black and Brown communities, to exercise their right to vote,” Delta CEO Ed Bastian wrote in a statement. “After having time to now fully understand all that is in the bill, coupled with discussions with leaders and employees in the Black community, it’s evident that the bill includes provisions that will make it harder for many underrepresented voters, particularly Black voters, to exercise their constitutional right to elect their representatives. That is wrong.”

In response, Republicans in the state House voted to repeal a law that gave the company massive tax breaks on jet fuel. “They like our public policy when we’re doing things that benefit them, and they reap the rewards of those benefits and then turn around and do this,” House Speaker David Ralston said on Thursday. “As all of you know, I can’t resist a country boy line or two, you don’t feed a dog that bites your hand. You’ve got to keep that in mind.”

Unfortunately, the bill failed to pass the state Senate so Delta’s tax cut remains in place. But now the company knows that getting involved in politics can have a detrimental impact on its ability to do business. In other words, shut up and take your money, Delta — before we take your money from you.

Rep. Matt Gaetz has spoken out about allegations that he had a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old girl. Liberals are currently in a feeding frenzy over Gaetz’s allegedly inappropriate relationship with the girl, but Gaetz says this is a “lie.”

“It is a horrible allegation, and it is a lie,” Gaetz told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson. “The New York Times is running a story that I have traveled with a 17-year-old woman, and that is verifiably false.” The story is the result of a Department of Justice leak to the New York Times — one that seems politically motivated at best. Gaetz is accused in the Times story of violating sex trafficking laws because he allegedly traveled with the girl.

The case was opened under Attorney General Bill Barr, who spent the later parts of his tenure attacking President Trump.

“People can look at my travel records and see that that is not the case,” Gaetz says. “What is happening is an extortion of me and my family involving a former Department of Justice official.” He says it’s part of an extortion plot.

“On March 16, my father got a text message demanding a meeting wherein a person demanded $25 million in exchange for making horrible sex trafficking allegations against me go away” Gaetz says.

“Our family was so troubled by that, we went to the local FBI,” Gaetz told Carlson. “And the FBI and the Department of Justice were so concerned about this attempted extortion of a member of Congress that they asked my dad to wear a wire, which he did with the former Department of Justice official.”

“Tonight, I am demanding that the Department of Justice and the FBI release the audio recordings that were made under their supervision and at their direction, which will prove my innocence and that will show that these allegations aren’t true,” Gaetz continued. “They are merely intended to try to bleed my family out of money.”

“And this former Department of Justice official tomorrow was supposed to be contacted by my father so that specific instructions could be given regarding the wiring of $4.5 million as a down payment on this bribe,” Gaetz says, naming former Northern District of Florida prosecutor David McGee as the man extorting him.  “He currently works at the Beggs & Lane law firm,” Gaetz says.

McGee insists that he has “no connection with that case at all” but admits that he has “spoken with Gaetz’s father.”

This is very troubling. Either Matt Gaetz has been a wolf in sheep’s clothing all along, or a massive conspiracy has been concocted to punish him for his support of President Trump while bleeding him and his family dry financially. Watch the interview below:

America is facing dark times under Joe Biden’s presidency. Illegals are flooding the border after Joe Biden invited them to come to America. Thousands are dying each day ov COVID-19 under his watch despite his promises to make it magically go away. America needs hope — but after the extremely problematic 2020 election, it sometimes feels like all hope is lost. Fortunately, President Trump — just like he did in 2016 and would have in 2020 — heard the call of millions of Americans and has decided to step up where he can. The President told his daughter Lara in an interview that he’s thinking about holding a rally soon.

 “We’re thinking about doing a rally relatively soon just to let everybody know that there’s hope in the future,” the President says. “I love doing them.”

In the latest attack on the President, Facebook removed the video. The social media platform says that any content “in the voice of Donald Trump” (including interviews, apparently) will be removed. This is the latest escalation since Facebook banned the President in January following the incident at the Capitol on January 6. Facebook warned a group of Trump officials that all content on both Facebook and Instagram “in the voice of President Trump is not currently allowed on our platforms (including new posts with President Trump speaking).” The company says that subsequent postings  “will be removed if posted, resulting in additional limitations on accounts” that posted it. Lara Trump received a similar warning:

“We are reaching out to let you know that we removed content from Lara Trump’s Facebook Page that featured President Trump speaking,” the message says. “In line with the block we placed on Donald Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts, further content posted in the voice of Donald Trump will be removed and result in additional limitations on the accounts.”

Despite social media’s attempts to censor him, President Trump continues to fight for and be there for the American people.

Imagine this: you’re kneeling to pray and suddenly government goons grab you and drag you out of church. This may sound like a nightmare to you, but to Deidre Hairston of Dallas Texas, it’s recent history.

Hairston, who is pregnant with child, was holding a baby and kneeling. But for some reason, it took three police officers to remove her from Mass at the Holy Trinity Church in Dallas. Hairston, who appeared on Dr. Taylor Marshall’s podcast to talk about the incident, even has video of the incident.

The pregnant mother says she was escorted out of church by the three goons just after Holy Communion with the Eucharist “still on her tongue.” One officer threatens to “place her in handcuffs” if she doesn’t leave. The woman asks if she is being arrested. “No, not right now. But if you don’t listen you will be, “the officer threatens. When Hairston asks what crime she committed, she is told she was “trespassing on a business.”

The worst part of this story is that she was betrayed by parish priest Father Ryan — the man she trusts to speak to her about God’s Word. Police took photos of her license plate and her information then issued her a ticket for trespassing.

To most people, this incident — a pregnant mother being dragged out of church while clutching a baby all because she trusted God to protect her from a pandemic — is the stuff of nightmares. But to the Diocese of Dallas, it’s just a normal day. In a statement, they defend Father Ryan’s decision to betray one of his flock.

As one commenter points out, the church has chosen to “turn its back on God” to instead serve what it seems to consider a greater power — the corrupt Biden Administration. Recently, we reported that the Biden Administration planned to weaponize the church to push the COVID vaccine. “I urge all local docs and ministers and priests to talk about why it’s important to get that vaccine,” Biden decreed. “And even after that, until everyone is in fact vaccinated, to wear this mask.”

Father Ryan? He listened to his orders a little bit too well.

Democrats love to call voter ID laws “racist,” but nothing could be further from the truth. Such laws exist to ensure that everyone who votes is eligible to do so — and this is something that, for one reason or another, the Democrat Party hates them so much. And just like everything else they don’t like, they cry “racism” in their efforts to make the problem go away.

This isn’t a new thing. In 2011, Democrat Maryland Rep. Steny Hoyer called voter ID a “poll tax,” which “by any other name would smell as vile.” In 2012, Maryland Senator Ben Cardin called attempts to verify that a voter is legitimate “the new Jim Crow laws of our time.” In the same year, Nancy Pelosi called them “voter suppression initiatives” — but the only votes they suppress are those that are cast illegitimately. Nevertheless, these lines of attack have only continued and intensified.

But are voter ID laws racist? Black Americans don’t think so. “This makes Jim Crow look like Jim Eagle. I mean, this is gigantic what they’re trying to do, and it cannot be sustained,” Joe Biden recently said of Georgia’s new voting laws, which include voter ID for mail-in ballots and other strong methods of protecting the integrity of the vote. A recent poll indicates that most Americans across all political ideologies and races support such initiatives.

“Should voters be required to show photo identification such as a driver’s license before being allowed to vote?” the poll asks. Nearly 70% of black voters and 8% of other non-whites say they should. 75 percent of white voters agree — a smaller percentage than non-black non-whites.

This poll strongly disputes liberal claims that non-white voters are either too stupid or too unwilling to comply with voter ID laws. They aren’t just willing to comply — they want them.

What kind of sick person would vandalize a message of love like, “Worried? JESUS offers security?”If you’re guessing that it was a group of leftists with chips on their collective shoulders, you’re exactly right. A Christian Aid Ministries billboard in Mississippi was vandalized with a message promoting baby murder.

This is what the billboard originally looked like:

The hateful act was carried out by a leftist “art collective” — and they were so proud of it they put out a press release:

“The alteration was carried out by the Activist Art Collective, INDECLINE and is in direct response to lawmakers throughout the South who continue their attempts to overturn Roe v. Wade. The collective also has immediate plans to turn the imagery from the vandalized billboard into an NFT and auction it off with proceeds going to the Planned Parenthood Action Fund.”

They even published photos of them committing this criminal act:

This is the final product:

It’s unclear why Christian Aid Ministries was targeted, but Gateway Pundit’s Cassandra Fairbanks notes that:

The ministry operates medical clinics in Haiti and Nicaragua. They also distribute food, clothing, medicines, and seeds to people in impoverished nations. They have also been known to help people in the US rebuild after natural disasters, build churches and provide alternative places of employment for conscientious objectors to serve should the U.S. activate a military draft.

Leftists are insane. There was no cause for this. All they did was attack a good group of Christians who do a lot to benefit the world just to promote the murder of the unborn. Naturally, you don’t see Planned Parenthood or anyone on the Left condemning this act of terrorism. Nor will you.

Joe Biden promised he would be transparent with the American people. Unfortunately, that isn’t what has happened. His administration — most notably White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki — has repeatedly deflected, hidden information, refused to answer simple questions, and all around betrayed Americans where that promise is concerned. On Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace held Psaki to account for all that.

“The only way we know how bad conditions are for some 5,000 minors in his Border Patrol facilities is because of these pictures that members of Congress have released on their own,” Wallace said. “Jen, these kids are living in these conditions now.”

“They’re not living in these conditions some indeterminate time from now when the president says everything will be fixed,” Wallace continued. “So why not allow reporters and camera crews in on a pool basis based domain safely to show the American people what’s happening in those border patrol facilities right now?”

“Chris, we are absolutely committed to that, the president is committed to that, I’m committed to that, Secretary Mayorkas is committed to that,” Psaki replied before Wallace interrupted, “When?”

“We want to provide access into the border patrol facility,” Psaki insisted. “We are mindful of the fact that we are in the middle of a pandemic. We want to keep these kids safe, keep the staff safe, but we are absolutely committed to transparency and providing access to media to the border patrol facilities, and we are working to get that done as soon as we can.”

“But just to clarify, you allowed a camera crew in to see the HHS facilities, but we are talking about here are the Border Patrol facilities, the detention cells, you know there is a law that they are not allowed to be there for more than 72 hours, many of them are there for ten days,” Wallace said. “At this point, in terms of allowing access to Border Patrol facilities for reporters, you are being less transparent than the Trump administration.”

This is true. The Trump administration was the most transparent in the history of the United States. Biden and Democrats love to attack President Trump, but the fact is that he was always and always will be interested in serving the American people. Watch it below:

Democrats love to tell us that they aren’t interested in taking our guns from us. But in court, the Biden Administration is trying to literally engage in gun-grabbing. The request is related to one specific case —  Caniglia v. Strom — but it “could have sweeping consequences for policing, due process, and mental health,” according to Forbes.

Forbes reports that The Biden administration and Attorneys General from nine states are asking the court to “uphold warrantless gun confiscation.” What was behind this request? The backstory began with an elderly couple arguing over a coffee mug:

In August 2015, 68-year-old Edward Caniglia joked to Kim, his wife of 22 years, that he didn’t use a certain coffee mug after his brother-in-law had used it because he “might catch a case of dishonesty.” That quip quickly spiraled into an hour-long argument. Growing exhausted from the bickering, Edward stormed into his bedroom, grabbed an unloaded handgun, and put it on the kitchen table in front of his wife. With a flair for the dramatic, he then asked: “Why don’t you just shoot me and get me out of my misery?”

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the tactic backfired and the two continued to argue. Eventually, Edward took a drive to cool off. But when he returned, their argument flared up once again. This time, Kim decided to leave the house and spend the night at a motel. The next day, Kim phoned home. No answer.

When there was no response, Kim called police to have a wellness check performed on her husband. Police found Edward to be “calm for the most part.” Despite this, they decided that he was a threat to himself for one reason or another and insisted that he go for a psychiatric evaluation. Edward initially refused, but agreed after police promised they would not confiscate his guns. But that’s exactly what they did — and they lied to his wife, telling her Edward had consented to confiscation:

Compounding the dishonesty, police then told Kim that Edward had consented to the confiscation. Believing the seizures were approved by her husband, Kim led the officers to the two handguns the couple owned, which were promptly seized. Even though Edward was immediately discharged from the hospital, police only returned the firearms after he filed a civil rights lawsuit against them.

Critically, when police seized the guns, they didn’t claim it was an emergency or to prevent imminent danger. Instead, the officers argued their actions were a form of “community caretaking,” a narrow exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.

Typically, the “community caretaking” exception is used to cases involving impounded cars and highway safety. But lately,  “everything from loud music to leaky pipes have been used to justify warrantless invasion of the home,” according to a joint amicus brief from the ACLU, Cato Institute, and American Conservative Union.

“When every interaction with police or request for help can become an invitation for police to invade the home, the willingness of individuals to seek assistance when it is most needed will suffer,” the brief says.

Nevertheless, the Biden administration argues that warrants should not be  “presumptively required when a government official’s action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest, such as health or safety.”

“The ultimate question in this case is therefore not whether the respondent officers’ actions fit within some narrow warrant exception,” the Biden Administration argues, “but instead whether those actions were reasonable.”

This is definitely a case to watch.

If the Biden presidency seems a lot like the Obama presidency, there may be a reason for that. According to a Fox News host, President* Biden isn’t in charge. While many have speculated that Vice President Kamala Harris is secretly running the show, one Fox host says her sources have told her who is really running things — and he’s a man who is not eligible to be President.

On Sunday Morning Futures, host Maria Bartiromo revealed who, according to her sources, is really running Washington. “He almost wants to prove to Obama that I can do what you couldn’t do when it comes to pandering to the liberal base and implementing progressive policy,” guest Charlie Kirk said during the segment.

“Ah!” Bartiromo replied. “That’s what it is. I know he’s on the phone all the time with Obama and I’m hearing that he’s running things from behind the scenes.”

She didn’t say who her sources are or what exactly they revealed past that. However, if this is true, it is a flagrant violation of our constitution, which bars someone from serving as President past two terms in office. It doesn’t specifically say anything about a former President whispering orders in the ear of the current President, but one can assume that this is not allowed either.

The Democrat Party is corrupt, and it’s not unknown for them to take orders from Obama in general. As Barack Obama’s former right-hand-man, it seems likely that Biden would listen and do as he is told. After all, his cognitive faculties are in question for a reason.

Watch it below: